<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rising Stream, LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.risingstream.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.risingstream.net</link>
	<description>Helping firms utilize technology to achieve their sales &#038; marketing goals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adobe Reader &#8211; The New Security Issue?</title>
		<link>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/03/18/adobe-reader-the-new-security-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/03/18/adobe-reader-the-new-security-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acrobat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrimoPDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risingstream.net/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#8217;s easy to target Microsoft for security issues, an organization must look at its entire infrastructure in order to maintain security.  eWeek recently looked at Adobe Reader and came away unimpressed, to the point of offering several alternatives for use inside an organization.
It began when one of their websites was hit by a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s easy to target Microsoft for security issues, an organization must look at its entire infrastructure in order to maintain security.  eWeek recently looked at Adobe Reader and came away unimpressed, to the point of <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/It-May-Be-Time-to-Abandon-Adobe/?kc=EWKNLINF03182009BESTOF4">offering several alternatives for use</a> inside an organization.</p>
<p>It began when <a href="http://blogs.eweek.com/cheap_hack/content/malware/really_its_not_our_fault.html">one of their websites was hit by a vulnerability</a> due to an advertisers use of an unpatched version of Adobe.  That was in February and patches were promised in March.</p>
<p>Have you <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Hackers-Zero-in-on-New-Adobe-Reader-Acrobat-Vulnerability/">upgraded your Acrobat and Reader applications</a>? If not, now is the time to ensure that <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/reader/">Reader</a> and <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/acrobat/">Acrobat</a> are up-to-date and you, and your clients, are protected.</p>
<p>You can also update from within the applications themselves.  For Reader, you can find Update under Help.  If you are running Reader v8, I don&#8217;t recommend moving to Reader v9 until you&#8217;ve tested other applications for support of v9.  While eWeek points to a couple of option, including <a href="http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/">Foxit</a> (for Firefox) I&#8217;ve been happy with <a href="http://www.primopdf.com/">PrimoPDF</a> for several years now. <u style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></u> <em style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></em> <strong style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a> <em style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></em> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/03/18/adobe-reader-the-new-security-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Security Updates for February</title>
		<link>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/02/16/microsoft-security-updates-for-february/</link>
		<comments>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/02/16/microsoft-security-updates-for-february/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Bulletins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.risingstream.net/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four available in the February release, two rated Critical and tied to Internet Explorer v7 (current) or Microsoft Exchange:
Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (961260)
голова болит секс
 
голова болит секс
голова болит секс
This security update resolves two privately reported vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user views a specially crafted Web page [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four available in <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-feb.mspx">the February release</a>, two rated Critical and tied to Internet Explorer v7 (current) or Microsoft Exchange:</p>
<p><strong>Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (961260)
<div style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></div>
<p> </strong>
<div style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></div>
<div style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></div>
<p>This security update resolves two privately reported vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user views a specially crafted Web page using Internet Explorer. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.</p>
<p><strong>Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Could Allow Remote Code Execution (959239)</strong><br />
This security update resolves two privately reported vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Server. The first vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a specially crafted TNEF message is sent to a Microsoft Exchange Server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of the affected system with Exchange Server service account privileges. The second vulnerability could allow denial of service if a specially crafted MAPI command is sent to a Microsoft Exchange Server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service and other services that use the EMSMDB32 provider to stop responding.</p>
<p>Extreme Tech <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2340866,00.asp">characterized the updates this way</a>:<br />
A few months ago Microsoft started including an &#8220;Exploitability Index&#8221; value to show how easy it should be to construct a successful attack using the vulnerability they were disclosing. In many cases, a vulnerability may be critical because the consequences of it being exploited are serious, but in fact it is not so easy to exploit.</p>
<p>Monday&#8217;s Internet Explorer vulnerabilities were give an Exploitability Index value of 1, which translates to &#8220;Consistent exploit code likely.&#8221; Microsoft adds the note &#8220;Consistent exploit code can be crafted easily.&#8221; See the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-feb.mspx">monthly security bulletin</a> summary and click on Exploitability Index for all this. For some reason, Microsoft does not include these Exploitability Index values in the individual security bulletins, such as the one for Internet Explorer yesterday.</p>
<p>What this means is that you can expect, or at least you should assume, that attack code to exploit this vulnerability will be on the Internet very soon. It will be pushed through all the usual channels, some of which are hard to avoid, such as ad banners. <strong style="display:none"><a href="http://nerealp.co.cc/121.html">голова болит секс</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.risingstream.net/2009/02/16/microsoft-security-updates-for-february/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.367 seconds -->
